[PIC] Which PIC32's to avoid?

[Neil]

Can someone remind me which were the PIC32's to avoid... wasn't it the
PIC32MZ...EC... line?
Isaac, I believe you know about this.

Cheers,
-Neil.

[Forrest Christian (List Account)]

c = crap,
f = fixed.

that's how I think about them.

You'll notice that the pic32mz ec is marked nrnd.
The pic32mz ef is a great part.

Post by Neil
Can someone remind me which were the PIC32's to avoid... wasn't it the
PIC32MZ...EC... line?
Isaac, I believe you know about this.
Cheers,
-Neil.
--
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

[Isaac M. Bavaresco]

Hi Neil,


Yes, the PIC32MZ...EC is very damaged. I think Microchip tries to deny
it ever existed.

The new PIC32MZ...EF has most (not all) of the issues fixed with a lower
price.

There are a few versions capable of running at 250 MHz and newer devices
have up to 8 MiB of DRAM on-chip.


Cheers,

Isaac

Post by Neil
Can someone remind me which were the PIC32's to avoid... wasn't it the
PIC32MZ...EC... line?
Isaac, I believe you know about this.
Cheers,
-Neil.

---
Este email foi escaneado pelo Avast antivírus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[Neil]

Thanks Isaac.

I'm using a PIC32MX part now and need a lot more RAM, so I'm looking at
the MZ parts, to avoid having to squeeze an external RAM chip on there..

Cheers,
-Neil.

Post by Isaac M. Bavaresco
Hi Neil,
Yes, the PIC32MZ...EC is very damaged. I think Microchip tries to deny
it ever existed.
The new PIC32MZ...EF has most (not all) of the issues fixed with a lower
price.
There are a few versions capable of running at 250 MHz and newer devices
have up to 8 MiB of DRAM on-chip.
Cheers,
Isaac

Post by Neil
Can someone remind me which were the PIC32's to avoid... wasn't it the
PIC32MZ...EC... line?
Isaac, I believe you know about this.
Cheers,
-Neil.

---
Este email foi escaneado pelo Avast antivírus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[Forrest Christian (List Account)]

Depending on your definition of a lot, there is a MZ DA part with in
package ddr....

Post by Neil
Thanks Isaac.
I'm using a PIC32MX part now and need a lot more RAM, so I'm looking at
the MZ parts, to avoid having to squeeze an external RAM chip on there..
Cheers,
-Neil.

Post by Isaac M. Bavaresco
Hi Neil,
Yes, the PIC32MZ...EC is very damaged. I think Microchip tries to deny
it ever existed.
The new PIC32MZ...EF has most (not all) of the issues fixed with a lower
price.
There are a few versions capable of running at 250 MHz and newer devices
have up to 8 MiB of DRAM on-chip.
Cheers,
Isaac

Post by Neil
Can someone remind me which were the PIC32's to avoid... wasn't it the
PIC32MZ...EC... line?
Isaac, I believe you know about this.
Cheers,
-Neil.

---
Este email foi escaneado pelo Avast antivírus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist